
Alternative Dispute Resolution
I engineer behaviours that prevent disputes and represent you decisively when they arise. From negotiation and mediation to 28-day adjudication, I run lean, evidence-led processes while BADR keeps issues de-escalated and records clean, so outcomes arrive faster, at lower cost, with less noise.
​
“Decisions shape outcomes; behaviour shapes trust.”
.png)
Behavioural ADR
We shape behaviours that prevent disputes and make formal ADR faster, cheaper, and decisive.
How it works
-
Reactive loop: Acknowledge → Clarify → Commit → Close (stops drift, creates a clean trail).
-
Proactive cadence: Anticipate → De-escalate → Resolve → Reinforce (kills repeat patterns).
-
Behavioural SLAs: responses/decisions in hours & days, not weeks.
-
Decision hygiene: one source of truth, lawful notice routes, evidence by default.
-
Best for Payment/valuation stand-offs • programme friction • multi-party interfaces • commissioning gates • live-site upgrades
-
You get (teaser) Behaviour Charter + bSLAs • Issue→Decision pathway • ADR route map (only when needed) • Lightweight telemetry
-
Impact: Fewer escalations • cleaner month-ends • faster change decisions • stronger cashflow • shorter, more decisive ADR
.png)
ADR Routes
Negotiation (without prejudice): scope/quantum gap, relationship intact. Hours-weeks; output: heads of terms/deed of variation.
-
Mediation (facilitative/evaluative): multi-issue basket; needs a neutral to unlock a deal. ½-1 day; output: binding settlement agreement.
-
Adjudication (UK construction): cash flow/time decision now. ~28 days from referral; output: temporarily binding, enforceable (“pay now, argue later”).
-
Expert determination: narrow technical/valuation question (e.g., productivity rates, M&E performance). Fast & focused; binding if the contract provides.
-
Dispute boards (DRB/DAB/DAAB): long, interface-heavy or cross-border programmes. In-period recommendations/decisions that prevent drift.
-
Early neutral evaluation (ENE): needs an indicative view to break the deadlock. Short, non-binding evaluation to catalyse settlement.
-
Mini-trial / executive panel: strategic disputes needing senior buy-in. Counsel-light presentations; principals decide.
-
Med-Arb / AMA: Attempt to settle first, but ensure finality. Settlement if possible; otherwise, a binding award.
-
Arbitration: private final determination (esp. international). Binding award, internationally enforceable.
-
Litigation remains an option, but ADR is typically faster, more confidential, and more controllable in terms of timetable and cost.
