top of page

Alternative Dispute Resolution

I engineer behaviours that prevent disputes and represent you decisively when they arise. From negotiation and mediation to 28-day adjudication, I run lean, evidence-led processes while BADR keeps issues de-escalated and records clean, so outcomes arrive faster, at lower cost, with less noise.

​

“Decisions shape outcomes; behaviour shapes trust.”

Behavioural ADR

Behavioural ADR

We shape behaviours that prevent disputes and make formal ADR faster, cheaper, and decisive.

How it works

  • Reactive loop: Acknowledge → Clarify → Commit → Close (stops drift, creates a clean trail).

  • Proactive cadence: Anticipate → De-escalate → Resolve → Reinforce (kills repeat patterns).

  • Behavioural SLAs: responses/decisions in hours & days, not weeks.

  • Decision hygiene: one source of truth, lawful notice routes, evidence by default.

  • Best for Payment/valuation stand-offs • programme friction • multi-party interfaces • commissioning gates • live-site upgrades

  • You get (teaser) Behaviour Charter + bSLAs • Issue→Decision pathway • ADR route map (only when needed) • Lightweight telemetry

  • Impact: Fewer escalations • cleaner month-ends • faster change decisions • stronger cashflow • shorter, more decisive ADR

Formal ADR
ADR Routes 

Negotiation (without prejudice):  scope/quantum gap, relationship intact. Hours-weeks; output: heads of terms/deed of variation.

  • Mediation (facilitative/evaluative): multi-issue basket; needs a neutral to unlock a deal. ½-1 day; output: binding settlement agreement.

  • Adjudication (UK construction): cash flow/time decision now. ~28 days from referral; output: temporarily binding, enforceable (“pay now, argue later”).

  • Expert determination: narrow technical/valuation question (e.g., productivity rates, M&E performance). Fast & focused; binding if the contract provides.

  • Dispute boards (DRB/DAB/DAAB): long, interface-heavy or cross-border programmes. In-period recommendations/decisions that prevent drift.

  • Early neutral evaluation (ENE): needs an indicative view to break the deadlock. Short, non-binding evaluation to catalyse settlement.

  • Mini-trial / executive panel: strategic disputes needing senior buy-in. Counsel-light presentations; principals decide.

  • Med-Arb / AMA: Attempt to settle first, but ensure finality. Settlement if possible; otherwise, a binding award.

  • Arbitration: private final determination (esp. international). Binding award, internationally enforceable.

  • Litigation remains an option, but ADR is typically faster, more confidential, and more controllable in terms of timetable and cost.

FAQs

FAQs

Can we mediate and adjudicate in parallel?

Yes. Adjudication sets a payable baseline; mediation packages the remaining issues.

bottom of page